No substantial velocity gain from longer barrels When fired out of a pistol barrel (47"), it can penetrate 1side of a PASGT Helmet and 2sides of a Interceptor vest from 15 yards I'm looking at the 762x25 handguns and found the most likely candidates to be the CZ52, TT33 and the M57 You can also replace the barrel with a 9mm barrel (if you can find one) if you prefer the stopping power of the 9mm over the penetration of the 765 molonlabe, #18 NCJohn Registered Member Joined The 9mm cartridge sits to the rear of that 762X25 magazine which is much longer than the 9mm The cartridge has to move a much longer distance before it hits the chamber so the chances of jamming is much greater That is why someone created the smaller magazine and the spacer that goes behind it It cuts the distance that the 9mm has to travel
Is 7 62x25 Appropriate For Self Defense Alloutdoor Com
7 62x25 vs 9mm
7 62x25 vs 9mm- 762X25 vs 9MM penetration « Reply #1 on , PM » I would rather have the 9mm, its easier on the targets IMHO it makes a big bang but is about the same as a very good 9mm round, which is considerably effective, but not the wonder round it's made out to be And as has been said, it's quite expensive The 762x25 Tokarev is a very fast light round, called the "pocket rifle" by some Something like an 80grain bullet moving out at 1500 fps
Using 7 inch thick booklistics compound we see just who is the champ of penetration Thanks for watching,please like, comment, subscribe, share,and pleasGeorg Luger established 9MM ammo in 1902 The 9MM ammo is the most used ammo in United States and other countries As a standard cartridge for the NATO and nonNATO forces, the 9mm is also used by more than 60% of police officers in the United States (762x25 ammo vs 9mm) The 762 x 25mm pistols are among the most interesting If you wish, you may handload the Tokarev cartridge with Hornady XTP bullets The original 762x25mm cartridge was designed for Hugo Borchardt's pistol Widely viewed as the first successful selfloading pistol, the Borchardt was also expensive I strive to compare such things as much as
9mm NATO 9mm NATO is 9x19mm ammo that conforms to NATO standards Like 9mm P, 9mm NATO is overpressurized, but not to the same extent 9mm NATO has a service pressure of 36,500 psi SIG's M17 9mm NATO ( Firearm News) By NATO standards, 9mm NATO has a bullet weight between 108grains and 128grains What handgun is better, Tokarev (762x25) vs Makarov (9x18 or 380)? Actually, the 762x25 is an odball cartridge Unlike the other Russian cartridges, 762x39 and 762x54r, the x25 is in fact 300/308 whereas the other are actually 303/311 During WWII the Russians used spare or damaged MosinNagant barrels because accuracy isn't all that great with open bolt subguns like the PPSh41 and PPS43 anyway
Oleg Volk 762×25 Tokarev cartridge is a higherpressure 1930 update of the 16 highvelocity 763mm Mauser Originally designed for pistols, it was also used in several submachine guns As a result, it used mainly medium speed powders and produces a substantial muzzle flash Most of the ammunition available is military surplus The 762 X 25 is a nice round but it's no 10mm And your really limited to 2 pistols the CZ52 and the Tokarev both are good guns They'd both make ok woods guns not my first choice but ok The Tok is a fairly small pistol too, a nice packin size The one drawback all the higher pressure rounds have for me is noise There is a video online that does a test with varied calibers, including 9mm, 45acp and 762x25mm vs the current Kevlar helmets 762x25 is the only one to fully go thru (both sides) some really hot 357 mag hand loads where able to punch a "divit" out of the inside that punched the water jug he had the helmet on
The 57 has a rebated rim bottleneck design, and the full cartridge is 405mm long, with its shell covering 2mm Its bullet and neck diameters are 57mm and 638mm, respectively Its shoulder diameter measures 795mm, while its base and rim diameter measure 795mm and 78mm, respectively The rifling twist of this cartridge is 2286mm Target was a 3/8th thick glass reinforced epoxy composite panel Pretty strong stuff as far as noncarbon fiber composites go I think that this info is pertinent to discussion of the *new* 327 Fed magnum cartridge for the Ruger SP101 The round is hotter than 38 special, but has bullets in the 85gr100gr range Some deride the round as essentially replicating 762 Tokarev, but for a revolver Comparisons with the 9mm are interesting
Recoil, 762x25 vs 9x18 Makarov Jump to Latest Follow 1 16 of 16 Posts L The 9x18 is not as effective as the 9mm, and the Tok round is known for overpenetration issues a super hot and small round Great for military, not as good for civilian use I am wondering how the 10mm would compare to the 762x25 such as the cz52 uses I am seeing quotes of 10/ 1300 fps with the 10mm and up to 1600 with the 762x25 The 762x25 is usually in 85 gr weight and the 10mm is around double that weightCZ ~ 52 ~ 762x25 Tokarev GI# This CZ model 52 is a right hand semiauto pistol in 762x25 Tokarev Cal It has a 475 inch barrel with a rear serrated slide A blade front sight and a notch rear sight The grip panels are a horizo Click for more info Seller Cabelas Richfield Area Code 262 $
655 J (4 ft⋅lbf) Test barrel length 1mm (4724 in) The 762×25mm Tokarev cartridge (designated as the 762 × 25 Tokarev by the CIP 5) is a Russian rimless bottlenecked pistol cartridge widely used in former Soviet states and in China, among other countries The cartridge has since been replaced in most capacities by the 9×18mm Three handloaded Hornady XTP bullets of various weights (762x25 tok) While the 357 gives an average of 0651 difference is 0153 And of course,weight is different,but penetration of each in gelatin,regarding the Hornady 90gr XTP in Tok and the Magnum,actually favors the magnum,interestingly enough,as 762x25 tokarev is known for its sheer The 762x25 Tokarev offers high velocity and power for its caliber and is capable of superb accuracy Pistols chambered for the Tokarev have been imported into the United States for several years, and you can get caliber conversion barrels for 1911type pistols to fit a 9mm38 Super breechface Factory ammunition is available at some gun stores
Answer (1 of 14) A range of variables are involved, one of which is the bullet's design and construction But you have an excellent element to continue here, based on the parameters of the original article, and that is pure pace The blister speedI like how the Tokarev has one of the more powerful handgun rounds but still less money than 9mm, with the Tokarev route I can get the handgun with hand select bore, a few spare magazines, maybe a holster, and over 800 rounds of ammo shipped and FFL transferred for $500 Or should I get aWe extend a Very Warm Welcome to all our Visitor Friends Ours is a close knit community whose goals are to educate our Pakistani Brethren in Gun Safety, Promote Information Exchange and
The shortest distance between 2 "points" is a straight line Generally Norinco handgun steel is very tough You could buy a Wolff recoil spring for the Tokarev none are offered for the 9mm and keep it on the 762 barrel There shoudn't be any problem that way Or you could buy Wichester 762 xRelatively, a 9mm handgun is going to have more recoil than a 762 rifle Handguns are lighter to begin with and a lot of modern 9mm frames are made from polymers instead of steel Also, in front of a jury, having a 762mmfiring rifle immediately makes you an evil, Trumpfollowing, racist gun hoarder Not part of the question
30 (762x25) vs 9mm;Anyway the 45 and 9mm do a far better job at transferring a larger percentage of their potential damage to the target than the 762x25 The 762 will retain more of its energy which isn't something you want in a bullet You want pistol rounds to be short and fat Not thin and long 762x25 tokarev was modified from the Mauser 763x25 which is The 762 is lighter and faster, bottle necked and has light armor piercing capability and cheap these days The 9mm para is a proven round with high velocity, effective stopping power and square necked What else are some of the comparisons of the 2 calibers?
Best performance out of a " barrel; The main reason the 762 X 25 Tok round lived on as long as it did was the Russian PPSh41 submachine gun Muzzle velocity of about 1500 fps, rate of fire 900 rounds per minute, 71 round drum magazine or 35 round box (preferred) and would kill at a hundred yards IIRC energy something like a 40 S&W None of the 9mm bullets perforated the American helmet which was in fact very badly dented Eight 762mm rimless bottlenecked cartridges 762X25 were fired from a postWW2 Russian made Tokarev TT33 pistol at the second helmet All the 762mm bullets perforated twice inside and exit the second American helmet The 762x25 is known to
Well I can't say if a round penetrated what might have happened I used to carry a 45acp and was quite happy with it I now carry a Yugo Tok, for under $0 including hand picked (both I got where unissued, not even wear on the feed ramp) Now, would I carry it bear hunting as a main weaponThe price savings of 762x25 are pretty much negated by the restriction on nonsteelcored ammo The 9mm is more readily available and more versatile On the other hand, the 762×25 is native to the pistol and makes a much more exciting soviet bark when fired Both pistols are ~$250 so longevity isn't really a concern here either The CIP pressure limit for the 762x25 Tokarev is 2,500 bar (or 36,259 psi) This is a little higher than the 9mm Luger's SAAMI pressure limit of 35,000 psi and a little less than the 38 Super's limit of 36,500 psi The cartridge's high pressure translates into a potent cartridge Ballistics hover in the range of the 9mm Luger P and 38
Some good buys are out there on the mags, so stock up while you still can The 762×51 again It may have a heavier projectile, but gravity affects bullets of all weights equally What matters is the 762×51's faster muzzle velocity, which permits its bullet to cover more ground in less time The 762×51 exhibits a bullet drop of about 14 inches at 300 yards, while the 762×39 drops nearly 24 inches in the samePPS43 762x25 1640 FPS 85g bullet 9mm 1312 FPS 124g bullet Results may vary _____ We're consumers We are byproducts of a lifestyle obsession Looking it up, it seems you can only expect maybe 50fps higher velocity with 9mm in a 6" vs 5" barrel Significant, but not quite 10mm Auto, especially in full power loadings Not that it
While the 762x25mm Tokarev retained the original overall length to a significant extent, the 9mm shortened it further to seat a larger diameter bullet While the 762x25mm Tokarev fires a inch diameter bullet, the 9mm comes with a larger 0355 inches diameter bulletThe 762 x 25mm (known as 762 x 25mm Tokarev) is a Russian, rimless, highvelocity, low caliber, bottlenecked pistol cartridge that was mostly used in exSoviet states and China However, after the Cold War ended, many weapons — especially pistols — from those former Soviet states became available worldwide, creating the demand that helped this Should You Get 762×25 Ammo A The standard 762x25 magazines loaded and cycled without a problem In fact, not having the 9mm spacer in the mag allowed it to load easier with less follower tension from the spacer I was shooting 124gr on brass cases from 50yds and the pistol and mags worked great!
The 762x25 is a much different story Winston Churchill used a broomhandle Mauser Model 96 during his engagements in South Africa and wrote home to his mother after one engagement that he had stood 30 meters from where the Hollowpoint 762x25 isn't to cheap, and frankly 945 is easier to get Also 9x18 is fine, but the ammo was harder to find and more expensive most times then 9x19 if I was just going to grab a box real fast Get a decent cheap 945 probably 9 due to price since the ballistics are all about the same Argos The trick with 7,62x25 tok is to load it with a 110 grain exposed soft lead jacketed round About 1600FPS 110 grains (chrono'd at between ), you get expansion from 30" to over 74" delivering massive energy to the target Mind you such a load will not penetrate a vest as the steel core surplus will
762x25 Pistol Cartridge Surplus is cheap, but is drying up and newproduction costs as much as the 30 Carbine;